Y is this Global Warming lawsuit necessary? Is it a sign that continuing not to take GW seriously is an error?
Alaska village sues companies for global warming
Dan Joling , Associated Press Writer
February 28, 2008
Anchorage, AK — A tiny Alaska village eroding into the Arctic Ocean sued two dozen oil, power and coal companies Tuesday, claiming that the large amounts of greenhouse gases they emit contribute to global warming that threatens the community’s existence.
The city of Kivalina and a federally recognized tribe, the Alaska Native village of Kivalina, sued Exxon Mobil Corp. and BP PLC, seven other oil companies, 14 power companies and one coal company in a lawsuit filed in federal court in San Francisco.
Kivalina is a traditional Inupiat Eskimo village of about 390 people about 625 miles northwest of Anchorage. It’s built on an 8-mile barrier reef between the Chukchi Sea and Kivalina River.
Sea ice traditionally protected the community, which has an economy based in part on salmon fishing and subsistence hunting of whale, seal, walrus and caribou.
But sea ice that forms later and melts sooner because of higher temperatures left the community unprotected from fall and winter storm waves and surges that lash coastal communities.
“We are seeing accelerated erosion because of the loss of sea ice,” City Administrator Janet Mitchell said in a statement. “We normally have ice starting in October, but now we have open water even into December so our island is not protected from the storms.”
Relocation costs are estimated at $400 million or more.
A spokesman for Exxon Mobil, Gantt Walton, said the company was reviewing the lawsuit and had no immediate comment on it.
Steve Rinehart, a spokesman for BP in Alaska, said he had not seen the lawsuit and had no comment.
ref:see balance of article at ---> http://www.dailyreporter.com/item.cfm?recid=20047975&snippet=f
The topic was also discussed on DemocracyNow.org.
Hey Bob see this--->“Global Disruption” More Accurately Describes Climate Change, Not “Global Warming”–Leading Scientist John Holdren
Leading scientist John Holdren says ‘global warming’ is not the correct term to use, he prefers ‘global disruption.’ “Global warming] is misleading, it implies something that is mainly about temperature, that’s gradual, and that’s uniform across the planet,” says Holdren. “In fact, temperature is only one of the things that’s changing it’s sort of an index of the state of the climate. The whole climate is changing: the winds, the ocean currents, the storm patterns, snowpack, snowmelt, flooding, droughts—temperature is just a bit of it.”
Listen to him at http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/3/global_disruption_more_accurately_describes_climate
Try and keep an open mind!
VOR, who here has insulted you that you feel turge to insult others?
Who are "they"?
I go tthe sources who are unafraid of discussing the truth.
Here's Holdren CV:
JOHN P. HOLDREN is the Director of the Woods Hole Research Center, as well as Teresa and John Heinz Professor of Environmental Policy and Director of the Program on Science, Technology, and Public Policy at the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. He is also Professor of Environmental Science and Policy in Harvard’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and the immediate past president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Holdren was educated at MIT and Stanford in aeronautics/astronautics (fluid dynamics) and theoretical plasma physics, receiving his PhD in 1970. After brief stints at the Livermore Lab and Caltech, he co-founded in 1973 and co-led until 1996 the campus-wide, interdisciplinary, graduate-degree program in energy and resources at UC Berkeley – the Energy and Resources Group (ERG). His work has focused on causes and consequences of global environmen
-tal change, fusion science & technology, comparative analysis of energy options, ways to reduce the dangers from nuclear weapons and materials, and the interaction of content and process in science and technology policy.
Dr. Holdren is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the Council on Foreign Relations. From 1993 through 2004 he served as Chair of the Committee on International Security and Arms Control of the National Academy of Sciences, and from 1994 to 2001 he was a member of President Clinton's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. Since 2002 he has been Co-Chair of the independent, bipartisan National Commission on Energy Policy.
He has been the recipient of a MacArthur Prize Fellowship (1981-86), the Volvo Environment Prize (1993), the Tyler Prize for Environment (2000), and the John Heinz Prize for Public Policy (2001), among other awards.
In 1995 he gave the acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of the Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs (which he served as Chair of the Executive Committee from 1987 to 1997).
4
Hey, mikey care to tell me your sources?
"and if you continue to get your 'scientific evidence' from blatantly political sites such as 'democracynow', you should be prepared to be criticised for your choice of source..." Only the demagogues do that. I bet NPR sux too huh?
Michio Kaku, the particle physicist, does he sux too? LOL-he follows the GW debate and he admires both Hansen and Holdren.
James Hansen spoke to Congress last week and he has called for a total ban on coal power plants to avoid increasing CO2 concentrations further past the tipping point. We are at 380.6 ppms right now!
Thanks for the ref, Bob.
I mean to thank the Bob who wrote this: "Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency et al, 2007"
This Q is about a current event and my Q addresses its import!
by Joe K Member since:
March 18, 2008
Total points:
473 (Level 2)
Remove Block
Best answer 64%33 answers
Member Since: March 18, 2008
Total Points: 473 (Level 2)
Points earned this week: 16
Remove Block
You gave this answer a low rating: Hide
If you wish to chat use a chatroom. This site is for asking questions, not for commenting on every answer.
Participant did not bother to A the current events Q! Pls delete him or don't bec this is the current events category!